Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCTR vs RECS
FCTR vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCTR vs RECS
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
Price$35.50
Change+$0.51 (+1.46%)
Volume$774
Net Assets57.72M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.50
Change+$0.52 (+1.30%)
Volume$599.06K
Net Assets4.14B
FCTR vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTR vs. RECS commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTR is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.14B vs. FCTR (57.7M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCTR: RECS (15.482) vs FCTR (6.543). FCTR was incepted earlier than RECS: FCTR (7 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCTR (0.65). FCTR has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCTR | RECS | FCTR / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.543 | 15.482 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 57.7M | 4.14B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Turnover | 431.00 | 49.00 | 880% |
| Yield | 0.56 | 0.60 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCTR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 87% | 20 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 12 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCTR has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCTR jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCTR | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| APH - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| CE - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CZR - FCTR | 75% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| TROW - FCTR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| EMN - FCTR | 73% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||