Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCTR vs RECS
FCTR vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FCTR vs RECS
First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF
Price$36.37
Change+$0.13 (+0.36%)
Volume$851
Net Assets54.56M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.31
Change+$0.09 (+0.22%)
Volume$534.29K
Net Assets4.78B
FCTR vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCTR vs. RECS commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCTR is a Buy and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.78B vs. FCTR (54.6M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FCTR: RECS (19.324) vs FCTR (10.764). FCTR was incepted earlier than RECS: FCTR (7 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FCTR (0.65). FCTR has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FCTR | RECS | FCTR / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.764 | 19.324 | 56% |
| Net Assets | 54.6M | 4.78B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Turnover | 431.00 | 49.00 | 880% |
| Yield | 0.57 | 0.92 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCTR | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCTR has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCTR jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCTR | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| APH - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| CE - FCTR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| CZR - FCTR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| HOOD - FCTR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| TROW - FCTR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||