FCSUF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.04 (+50.00%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
179.29M
TGMR
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
40.71K
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCSUF vs TGMR

Header iconFCSUF vs TGMR Comparison
Open Charts FCSUF vs TGMRBanner chart's image
Focus Minerals
Price$0.12
Change+$0.04 (+50.00%)
Volume$1.65K
Capitalization179.29M
Troy Gold & Mineral
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization40.71K
FCSUF vs TGMR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCSUF vs. TGMR commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSUF is a Hold and TGMR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FCSUF: $0.12 vs. TGMR: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FCSUF and TGMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCSUF: 100% vs. TGMR: 32%
Market capitalization -- FCSUF: $179.29M vs. TGMR: $40.71K
FCSUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $179.29M. TGMR’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $40.71K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCSUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGMR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCSUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGMR is a better buy in the long-term than FCSUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCSUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCSUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TGMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGMR is a better buy in the short-term than FCSUF.

Price Growth

FCSUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TGMR (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSUF($179M) has a higher market cap than TGMR($40.7K). TGMR YTD gains are higher at: 61.290 vs. FCSUF (50.000).
FCSUFTGMRFCSUF / TGMR
Capitalization179M40.7K439,803%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD50.00061.29082%
P/E Ratio17.56N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCSUF vs TGMR: Fundamental Ratings
FCSUF
TGMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3429
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGMR's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCSUF (63). This means that TGMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCSUF’s over the last 12 months.

TGMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FCSUF (100). This means that TGMR’s stock grew similarly to FCSUF’s over the last 12 months.

FCSUF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as TGMR (100). This means that FCSUF’s stock grew similarly to TGMR’s over the last 12 months.

TGMR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FCSUF (51). This means that TGMR’s stock grew similarly to FCSUF’s over the last 12 months.

FCSUF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGMR (100). This means that FCSUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCSUFTGMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMPAX30.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value A
MXTFX6.96N/A
N/A
Empower Small Cap Value Instl
JMCGX29.36N/A
N/A
Jacob Discovery Fd Inv
MRGKX60.35-0.33
-0.54%
MFS Core Equity R6
ECSMX10.73-0.09
-0.83%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C

FCSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCSUF and PMDRF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCSUF and PMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCSUF
1D Price
Change %
FCSUF100%
N/A
PMDRF - FCSUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGMR - FCSUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDYFF - FCSUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A

TGMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TGMR and RVTI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGMR and RVTI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGMR
1D Price
Change %
TGMR100%
N/A
RVTI - TGMR
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDYFF - TGMR
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCSUF - TGMR
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - TGMR
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLVMF - TGMR
-10%
Poorly correlated
N/A