FCSUF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.04 (+50.00%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
179.29M
PMDRF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCSUF vs PMDRF

Header iconFCSUF vs PMDRF Comparison
Open Charts FCSUF vs PMDRFBanner chart's image
Focus Minerals
Price$0.12
Change+$0.04 (+50.00%)
Volume$1.65K
Capitalization179.29M
BRASNOVA ENERGY MATLS
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization5.43M
FCSUF vs PMDRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCSUF vs. PMDRF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSUF is a Hold and PMDRF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FCSUF: $0.12 vs. PMDRF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: FCSUF and PMDRF are both not notable
FCSUF represents the Precious Metals, while PMDRF is part of the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCSUF: 100% vs. PMDRF: 26%
Market capitalization -- FCSUF: $179.29M vs. PMDRF: $5.43M
FCSUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $179.29M. PMDRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCSUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePMDRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCSUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PMDRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMDRF is a better buy in the long-term than FCSUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCSUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMDRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCSUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PMDRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FCSUF and PMDRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FCSUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PMDRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +104.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.94% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSUF($179M) has a higher market cap than PMDRF($5.43M). PMDRF YTD gains are higher at: 75.826 vs. FCSUF (50.000).
FCSUFPMDRFFCSUF / PMDRF
Capitalization179M5.43M3,298%
EBITDAN/A-1.87M-
Gain YTD50.00075.82666%
P/E Ratio17.56N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A205K-
Total DebtN/A1.57M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCSUF: Fundamental Ratings
FCSUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCSUFPMDRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMDRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMPAX30.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value A
MXTFX6.96N/A
N/A
Empower Small Cap Value Instl
JMCGX29.36N/A
N/A
Jacob Discovery Fd Inv
MRGKX60.35-0.33
-0.54%
MFS Core Equity R6
ECSMX10.73-0.09
-0.83%
Eaton Vance Small-Cap C

FCSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCSUF and PMDRF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCSUF and PMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCSUF
1D Price
Change %
FCSUF100%
N/A
PMDRF - FCSUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGMR - FCSUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDYFF - FCSUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A

PMDRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMDRF has been loosely correlated with ENDGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMDRF jumps, then ENDGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMDRF
1D Price
Change %
PMDRF100%
N/A
ENDGF - PMDRF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BYAGF - PMDRF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAEKY - PMDRF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VTXXF - PMDRF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APRAF - PMDRF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More