Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs WSBFX
FCSDX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs WSBFX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$22.95
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.91M
FCSDX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. WSBFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. WSBFX (154M). FCSDX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FCSDX (1.44) vs WSBFX (1.32). FCSDX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FCSDX (22 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FCSDX (0) vs WSBFX (100000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.74 vs. WSBFX (3.23). FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. WSBFX (19.22).
| FCSDX | WSBFX | FCSDX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.95 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.95 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.733 | 3.007 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 154M | 3,382% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.32 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 3.23 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 9.96 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 19.22 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.56 | 57.18 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers