Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs PADEX
FCSDX vs PADEX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs PADEX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
Price$22.55
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.86B
FCSDX vs PADEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. PADEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Buy and PADEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. PADEX (2.86B). PADEX pays higher dividends than FCSDX: PADEX (1.93) vs FCSDX (1.44). FCSDX was incepted earlier than PADEX: FCSDX (22 years) vs PADEX (13 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than PADEX (0.78). PADEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. FCSDX (36.00). FCSDX (0) and PADEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCSDX (7.74) and PADEX (7.61) have marching annual gain over last year. PADEX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. FCSDX (29.47).
| FCSDX | PADEX | FCSDX / PADEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.78 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.78 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.733 | 10.107 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 2.86B | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.93 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 7.61 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 42.55 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 40.97 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.56 | 52.36 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers