Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs LMCMX
FCSDX vs LMCMX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs LMCMX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.06
Change-$0.15 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
Miller Income IS
Price$8.43
Change-$0.11 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.3M
FCSDX vs LMCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. LMCMX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Buy and LMCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. LMCMX (163M). LMCMX pays higher dividends than FCSDX: LMCMX (5.54) vs FCSDX (1.47). FCSDX was incepted earlier than LMCMX: FCSDX (21 years) vs LMCMX (11 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than LMCMX (1.06). LMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FCSDX (36.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCMX: FCSDX (0) vs LMCMX (1000000). LMCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.21 vs. FCSDX (5.98). LMCMX return over 5 years is better than : 77.89 vs. FCSDX (30.04).
| FCSDX | LMCMX | FCSDX / LMCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.91 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.06 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.829 | -1.360 | -208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.13B | 163M | 3,148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 5.54 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 17.21 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.32 | 42.39 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.04 | 77.89 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.28 | 58.32 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement