Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs LMCMX
FCSDX vs LMCMX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs LMCMX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income IS
Price$8.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.63M
FCSDX vs LMCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. LMCMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Buy and LMCMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LMCMX (175M). LMCMX pays higher dividends than FCSDX: LMCMX (5.55) vs FCSDX (1.44). FCSDX was incepted earlier than LMCMX: FCSDX (22 years) vs LMCMX (11 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than LMCMX (1.06). LMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FCSDX (36.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMCMX: FCSDX (0) vs LMCMX (1000000). LMCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.32 vs. FCSDX (7.74). LMCMX return over 5 years is better than : 89.10 vs. FCSDX (29.47).
| FCSDX | LMCMX | FCSDX / LMCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.91 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.06 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.733 | 6.565 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 175M | 2,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 5.55 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 16.32 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 56.44 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 89.10 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.56 | 83.44 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers