Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs LMCKX
FCSDX vs LMCKX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs LMCKX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income FI
Price$9.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.63M
FCSDX vs LMCKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. LMCKX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Buy and LMCKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LMCKX (175M). LMCKX pays higher dividends than FCSDX: LMCKX (4.64) vs FCSDX (1.44). FCSDX was incepted earlier than LMCKX: FCSDX (22 years) vs LMCKX (11 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than LMCKX (1.47). LMCKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FCSDX (36.00). FCSDX (0) and LMCKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMCKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. FCSDX (7.74). LMCKX return over 5 years is better than : 85.98 vs. FCSDX (29.47).
| FCSDX | LMCKX | FCSDX / LMCKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.32 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.47 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.733 | 6.362 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 175M | 2,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 4.64 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 16.01 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 54.86 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 85.98 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.56 | 78.11 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers