Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs LKBLX
FCSDX vs LKBLX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs LKBLX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
LK Balanced Institutional
Price$53.75
Change+$0.24 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.33M
FCSDX vs LKBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. LKBLX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Buy and LKBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LKBLX (25.3M). LKBLX pays higher dividends than FCSDX: LKBLX (1.59) vs FCSDX (1.44). FCSDX was incepted earlier than LKBLX: FCSDX (22 years) vs LKBLX (13 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than LKBLX (1.46). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. LKBLX (16.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LKBLX: FCSDX (0) vs LKBLX (50000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.74 vs. LKBLX (-2.82). FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 29.47 vs. LKBLX (22.24).
| FCSDX | LKBLX | FCSDX / LKBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.00 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.46 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.733 | 3.425 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 50000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 25.3M | 20,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.59 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | -2.82 | -274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.25 | 8.99 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 22.24 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.56 | 37.42 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement