Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCSDX vs LCMNX
FCSDX vs LCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FCSDX vs LCMNX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
Miller Income C
Price$9.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.63M
FCSDX vs LCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCSDX vs. LCMNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCSDX is a Buy and LCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. LCMNX (175M). LCMNX pays higher dividends than FCSDX: LCMNX (3.59) vs FCSDX (1.44). FCSDX was incepted earlier than LCMNX: FCSDX (22 years) vs LCMNX (11 years). LCMNX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FCSDX (1.67). LCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FCSDX (36.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCMNX: FCSDX (0) vs LCMNX (1000). LCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.17 vs. FCSDX (7.62). LCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 80.78 vs. FCSDX (29.33).
| FCSDX | LCMNX | FCSDX / LCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.98 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.13 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.612 | 6.055 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.21B | 175M | 2,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 3.59 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.62 | 15.17 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.11 | 52.08 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.33 | 80.78 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.41 | 67.77 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers