FCRM
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.18 (-90.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1M
HYPOF
Price
$214.69
Change
-$10.30 (-4.58%)
Updated
Mar 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCRM vs HYPOF

Header iconFCRM vs HYPOF Comparison
Open Charts FCRM vs HYPOFBanner chart's image
Franklin Credit Management
Price$0.02
Change-$0.18 (-90.00%)
Volume$597.6K
Capitalization1M
Hypoport AG
Price$214.69
Change-$10.30 (-4.58%)
Volume$5
Capitalization1.26B
FCRM vs HYPOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCRM vs. HYPOF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCRM is a Hold and HYPOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FCRM: $0.20 vs. HYPOF: $214.70)
Brand notoriety: FCRM and HYPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCRM: 3% vs. HYPOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FCRM: $1M vs. HYPOF: $1.26B
FCRM [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1M. HYPOF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHYPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HYPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCRM and HYPOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

FCRM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HYPOF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYPOF($1.26B) has a higher market cap than FCRM($1M). HYPOF has higher P/E ratio than FCRM: HYPOF (108.70) vs FCRM (2.71). FCRM YTD gains are higher at: 79.000 vs. HYPOF (-29.552). FCRM has less debt than HYPOF: FCRM (688K) vs HYPOF (192M). HYPOF has higher revenues than FCRM: HYPOF (413M) vs FCRM (12.8M).
FCRMHYPOFFCRM / HYPOF
Capitalization1M1.26B0%
EBITDAN/A42.7M-
Gain YTD79.000-29.552-267%
P/E Ratio2.71108.702%
Revenue12.8M413M3%
Total CashN/A83.1M-
Total Debt688K192M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCRM vs HYPOF: Fundamental Ratings
FCRM
HYPOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9940
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6871
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10024
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCRM's Valuation (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYPOF (93). This means that FCRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

FCRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HYPOF (100). This means that FCRM’s stock grew similarly to HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

FCRM's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as HYPOF (71). This means that FCRM’s stock grew similarly to HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

FCRM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HYPOF (57). This means that FCRM’s stock grew similarly to HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

HYPOF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCRM (100). This means that HYPOF’s stock grew significantly faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FCRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCRM and FNLIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCRM and FNLIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCRM
1D Price
Change %
FCRM100%
N/A
FNLIF - FCRM
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENVA - FCRM
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
FMCC - FCRM
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
FNMA - FCRM
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
FAVO - FCRM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HYPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYPOF and FMCC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYPOF and FMCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYPOF
1D Price
Change %
HYPOF100%
N/A
FMCC - HYPOF
9%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
FNMA - HYPOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
FCRM - HYPOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAURY - HYPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNLIF - HYPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More