FCRM
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.03 (+150.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1M
FNMA
Price
$9.73
Change
-$0.25 (-2.51%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
510.72M
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCRM vs FNMA

Header iconFCRM vs FNMA Comparison
Open Charts FCRM vs FNMABanner chart's image
Franklin Credit Management
Price$0.05
Change+$0.03 (+150.00%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization1M
Fannie Mae
Price$9.73
Change-$0.25 (-2.51%)
Volume$4.31M
Capitalization510.72M
FCRM vs FNMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCRM vs. FNMA commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCRM is a Hold and FNMA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FCRM: $0.05 vs. FNMA: $9.73)
Brand notoriety: FCRM and FNMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCRM: 20% vs. FNMA: 52%
Market capitalization -- FCRM: $1M vs. FNMA: $510.72M
FCRM [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1M. FNMA’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $510.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNMA is a better buy in the long-term than FCRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNMA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCRM is a better buy in the short-term than FNMA.

Price Growth

FCRM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +174.73% price change this week, while FNMA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -2.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNMA($511M) has a higher market cap than FCRM($1M). FNMA has higher P/E ratio than FCRM: FNMA (833.33) vs FCRM (2.71). FNMA YTD gains are higher at: 196.646 vs. FCRM (-54.545). FCRM has less debt than FNMA: FCRM (688K) vs FNMA (4.23T). FNMA has higher revenues than FCRM: FNMA (29.8B) vs FCRM (12.8M).
FCRMFNMAFCRM / FNMA
Capitalization1M511M0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-54.545196.646-28%
P/E Ratio2.71833.330%
Revenue12.8M29.8B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt688K4.23T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCRM vs FNMA: Fundamental Ratings
FCRM
FNMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1009
SMR RATING
1..100
67100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9834
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1003
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCRM's Valuation (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNMA (100). This means that FCRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNMA’s over the last 12 months.

FNMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCRM (100). This means that FNMA’s stock grew significantly faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

FCRM's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNMA (100). This means that FCRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNMA’s over the last 12 months.

FNMA's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCRM (98). This means that FNMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

FNMA's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCRM (100). This means that FNMA’s stock grew significantly faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCRMFNMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWHLX11.040.10
+0.91%
Nationwide Bailard Intl Eqs M
LQFLX14.020.12
+0.86%
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R3
CBDYX54.360.18
+0.33%
Columbia Balanced Inst3
MLPEX7.64N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 C
UIPMX29.31-1.10
-3.62%
Victory Precious Metals & Minerals Instl

FCRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCRM and FNLIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCRM and FNLIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCRM
1D Price
Change %
FCRM100%
N/A
FNLIF - FCRM
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENVA - FCRM
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
FMCC - FCRM
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
FNMA - FCRM
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
FAVO - FCRM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FNMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNMA has been closely correlated with FMCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNMA jumps, then FMCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNMA
1D Price
Change %
FNMA100%
-2.51%
FMCC - FNMA
92%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
CACC - FNMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
WSC - FNMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
ENVA - FNMA
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
MAURY - FNMA
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More