FCRM
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.03 (+150.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1M
FNLIF
Price
$27.63
Change
+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCRM vs FNLIF

Header iconFCRM vs FNLIF Comparison
Open Charts FCRM vs FNLIFBanner chart's image
Franklin Credit Management
Price$0.05
Change+$0.03 (+150.00%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization1M
First National Financial
Price$27.63
Change+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Volume$7.22K
Capitalization1.65B
FCRM vs FNLIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCRM vs. FNLIF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCRM is a Hold and FNLIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FCRM: $0.05 vs. FNLIF: $27.63)
Brand notoriety: FCRM and FNLIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCRM: 20% vs. FNLIF: 167%
Market capitalization -- FCRM: $1M vs. FNLIF: $1.65B
FCRM [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1M. FNLIF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNLIF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FCRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNLIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNLIF is a better buy in the long-term than FCRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNLIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNLIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCRM is a better buy in the short-term than FNLIF.

Price Growth

FCRM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +174.73% price change this week, while FNLIF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNLIF($1.65B) has a higher market cap than FCRM($1M). FNLIF has higher P/E ratio than FCRM: FNLIF (12.33) vs FCRM (2.71). FNLIF YTD gains are higher at: -1.401 vs. FCRM (-54.545). FCRM has less debt than FNLIF: FCRM (688K) vs FNLIF (38.8B). FNLIF has higher revenues than FCRM: FNLIF (504M) vs FCRM (12.8M).
FCRMFNLIFFCRM / FNLIF
Capitalization1M1.65B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-54.545-1.4013,894%
P/E Ratio2.7112.3322%
Revenue12.8M504M3%
Total CashN/A631M-
Total Debt688K38.8B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCRM vs FNLIF: Fundamental Ratings
FCRM
FNLIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
6725
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9856
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLIF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCRM (64). This means that FNLIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

FNLIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FCRM (100). This means that FNLIF’s stock grew similarly to FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

FNLIF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCRM (67). This means that FNLIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

FNLIF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCRM (98). This means that FNLIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

FNLIF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCRM (100). This means that FNLIF’s stock grew significantly faster than FCRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCRMFNLIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLCNX34.760.26
+0.75%
Fidelity Contrafund K6
NEIAX55.000.28
+0.51%
Columbia Large Cap Index A
ARIMX10.070.02
+0.20%
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value I
JSVSX14.740.02
+0.14%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value S
FTCNX74.97-0.52
-0.69%
Fidelity Advisor Canada M

FCRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCRM and FNLIF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCRM and FNLIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCRM
1D Price
Change %
FCRM100%
N/A
FNLIF - FCRM
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ENVA - FCRM
28%
Poorly correlated
+5.17%
FMCC - FCRM
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
FNMA - FCRM
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
FAVO - FCRM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FNLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLIF has been loosely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNLIF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLIF
1D Price
Change %
FNLIF100%
N/A
ENVA - FNLIF
41%
Loosely correlated
+5.17%
MA - FNLIF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
WU - FNLIF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
FCRM - FNLIF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPRT - FNLIF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
More