Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs XLC
FCOM vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs XLC
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$70.28
Change+$0.33 (+0.47%)
Volume$106.85K
Net Assets1.78B
The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF
Price$114.69
Change+$0.61 (+0.53%)
Volume$5.32M
Net Assets26.14B
FCOM vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. XLC commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and XLC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 26.1B vs. FCOM (1.78B). FCOM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FCOM (20.312) vs XLC (19.108). FCOM was incepted earlier than XLC: FCOM (12 years) vs XLC (7 years). XLC (0.08) and FCOM (0.08) have comparable expense ratios . XLC has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | XLC | FCOM / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 20.312 | 19.108 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 26.1B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 105% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 25.00 | 84% |
| Yield | 0.85 | 0.95 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| META - FCOM | 86% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| META - XLC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 70% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 70% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 69% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| LYV - XLC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||