Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs XLC
FCOM vs XLC Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs XLC
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$72.99
Change-$1.17 (-1.58%)
Volume$1.65K
Net Assets1.82B
State Street® CommServSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$116.80
Change-$0.94 (-0.80%)
Volume$41.27K
Net Assets27.81B
FCOM vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. XLC commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and XLC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 27.8B vs. FCOM (1.82B). FCOM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FCOM (1.201) vs XLC (0.017). FCOM was incepted earlier than XLC: FCOM (12 years) vs XLC (8 years). XLC (0.08) and FCOM (0.08) have comparable expense ratios . XLC has a higher turnover FCOM (13.00) vs FCOM (13.00).
| FCOM | XLC | FCOM / XLC | |
| Gain YTD | 1.201 | 0.017 | 7,070% |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 27.8B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 105% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 40.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.85 | 1.11 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -1.40% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -6.57% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
More | ||||
XLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| META - XLC | 78% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 69% Closely correlated | -6.57% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 68% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 67% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| LYV - XLC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
More | ||||