Advertisement
FCOM vs SNAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and SNAP is a Buy.
SNAP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | SNAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 17 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BRWJX | 26.55 | 0.19 | +0.72% |
| MFS Blended Research Growth Eq I | |||
| VTMNX | 18.28 | 0.11 | +0.61% |
| Vanguard Developed Markets Index Instl | |||
| LAMHX | 24.32 | 0.08 | +0.33% |
| Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6 | |||
| JOEMX | 13.44 | -0.04 | -0.30% |
| JOHCM Emerging Markets Opps Instl | |||
| AAWEX | 16.42 | -0.06 | -0.36% |
| Cavanal Hill World Energy A | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 79% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| SNAP - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | +7.13% | ||
| PINS - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||
SNAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNAP has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNAP jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNAP | 100% | +7.13% | ||
| META - SNAP | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| PINS - SNAP | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| GOOG - SNAP | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| GOOGL - SNAP | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| IAC - SNAP | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
More | ||||