Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs OND
FCOM vs OND Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs OND
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$64.45
Change+$0.78 (+1.23%)
Volume$95.04K
Net Assets1.61B
ProShares On-Demand ETF
Price$42.20
Change+$0.22 (+0.52%)
Volume$1.54K
Net Assets2.1M
FCOM vs OND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. OND commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and OND is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.61B vs. OND (2.1M). OND has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: OND (29.233) vs FCOM (10.332). FCOM was incepted earlier than OND: FCOM (12 years) vs OND (4 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OND (0.58). OND has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | OND | FCOM / OND | |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | 29.233 | 35% |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 2.1M | 76,605% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.58 | 14% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 31.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | OND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 79% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| SNAP - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | +7.13% | ||
| PINS - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||
OND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OND | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| DASH - OND | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| SPOT - OND | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| EA - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| TTWO - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| SNAP - OND | 44% Loosely correlated | +7.13% | ||
More | ||||