Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs OND
FCOM vs OND Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs OND
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$66.08
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
Volume$439
Net Assets1.72B
ProShares On-Demand ETF
Price$43.76
Change+$0.31 (+0.71%)
Volume$826
Net Assets6.54M
FCOM vs OND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. OND commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and OND is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.72B vs. OND (6.54M). OND has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: OND (33.059) vs FCOM (13.037). FCOM was incepted earlier than OND: FCOM (12 years) vs OND (4 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OND (0.58). OND has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | OND | FCOM / OND | |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 33.059 | 39% |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 6.54M | 26,227% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.58 | 14% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 31.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | OND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| META - FCOM | 86% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 68% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 67% Closely correlated | +3.28% | ||
More | ||||
OND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OND | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| DASH - OND | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.35% | ||
| SPOT - OND | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| EA - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| TTWO - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | -4.03% | ||
| SNAP - OND | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
More | ||||