Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs OND
FCOM vs OND Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs OND
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$70.28
Change+$0.33 (+0.47%)
Volume$106.85K
Net Assets1.78B
ProShares On-Demand ETF
Price$44.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.27%)
Volume$1.05K
Net Assets6.7M
FCOM vs OND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. OND commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and OND is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.78B vs. OND (6.7M). OND has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: OND (37.018) vs FCOM (20.312). FCOM was incepted earlier than OND: FCOM (12 years) vs OND (4 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than OND (0.58). OND has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | OND | FCOM / OND | |
| Gain YTD | 20.312 | 37.018 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 6.7M | 26,560% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.58 | 14% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 31.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 0.85 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | OND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| META - FCOM | 86% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
OND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OND has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OND jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OND | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| DASH - OND | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| SPOT - OND | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| EA - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| TTWO - OND | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| SNAP - OND | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
More | ||||