Advertisement
FCOM vs META
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and META is a Buy.
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMAPX | 28.37 | 0.30 | +1.07% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts P | |||
| EIMGX | 33.04 | 0.23 | +0.70% |
| Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Small-Cap I | |||
| FSCNX | 16.36 | 0.05 | +0.31% |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C | |||
| CFIAX | 14.40 | 0.04 | +0.28% |
| Columbia Flexible Capital Income A | |||
| VDVIX | 14.24 | 0.02 | +0.14% |
| Vanguard Developed Markets Index Inv | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| LLYVK - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| PINS - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| GOOG - META | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| GOOGL - META | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| PINS - META | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SNAP - META | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| DASH - META | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.00% | ||
More | ||||