Advertisement
FCOM vs META
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and META is a Buy.
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WIGRX | 89.03 | 0.72 | +0.82% |
| Wasatch Core Growth Institutional | |||
| GDSTX | 26.25 | 0.15 | +0.57% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts Inv | |||
| RLBCX | 36.95 | 0.07 | +0.19% |
| American Funds American Balanced R3 | |||
| RGAVX | 14.52 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
| ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc A | |||
| BRXSX | 15.91 | -0.09 | -0.56% |
| MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R2 | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| LLYVK - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| LLYVA - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| GOOG - META | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| GOOGL - META | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PINS - META | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| DASH - META | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| SNAP - META | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||