Advertisement
FCOM vs META
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and META is a Buy.
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 19 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RRRRX | 21.71 | -0.15 | -0.69% |
| DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Instl | |||
| GSPAX | 17.20 | -0.15 | -0.86% |
| Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium A | |||
| HWLIX | 42.33 | -0.44 | -1.03% |
| Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value I | |||
| VLISX | 572.51 | -6.41 | -1.11% |
| Vanguard Large Cap Index Institutional | |||
| SPSAX | 18.42 | -0.33 | -1.76% |
| Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq A | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 79% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| META - FCOM | 77% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| MSGS - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| LLYVK - FCOM | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | -1.51% | ||
| GOOGL - META | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| GOOG - META | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| PINS - META | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| DASH - META | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| SNAP - META | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.34% | ||
More | ||||