Advertisement
FCOM vs LYV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a StrongBuy and LYV is a Hold.
LYV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | LYV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ASMH | 71.01 | 0.89 | +1.27% |
| ASML HOLDING NV ADRHEDGED ASMH | |||
| LVHI | 36.81 | 0.22 | +0.60% |
| Franklin Intl Low Volatility Hi Div ETF | |||
| FEM | 27.55 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| First Trust Emerging Mrkts AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| IYLD | 21.49 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Inc ETF | |||
| UCC | 52.27 | -0.78 | -1.47% |
| ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||
LYV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYV has been closely correlated with LLYVK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYV jumps, then LLYVK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYV | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| LLYVK - LYV | 92% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| LLYVA - LYV | 91% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| FOX - LYV | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NWSA - LYV | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| DIS - LYV | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||