Advertisement
FCOM vs LYV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and LYV is a Hold.
LYV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | LYV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MNDFX | 8.75 | 0.03 | +0.34% |
| Manning & Napier Disciplined Value I | |||
| AWACX | 25.01 | 0.05 | +0.20% |
| AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy C | |||
| FITLX | 29.52 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index | |||
| FIQDX | 8.83 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret Z | |||
| VTPSX | 159.24 | -0.08 | -0.05% |
| Vanguard Total Intl Stock Idx InstlPls | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.29% | ||
More | ||||
LYV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYV has been closely correlated with LLYVK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYV jumps, then LLYVK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYV | 100% | +2.29% | ||
| LLYVK - LYV | 92% Closely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| LLYVA - LYV | 91% Closely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| FOX - LYV | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| NWSA - LYV | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| FOXA - LYV | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
More | ||||