Advertisement
FCOM vs GOOGL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and GOOGL is a Hold.
GOOGL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | GOOGL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 21 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OILU | 27.61 | 1.55 | +5.95% |
| MicroSectorsTM Oil&Gs Exp&Pd 3X Lvg ETNs | |||
| BBRE | 95.18 | 0.74 | +0.78% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | |||
| XTRE | 49.80 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg ThreeYrTrgDurUSTrETF | |||
| QTOP | 32.17 | -0.44 | -1.35% |
| iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | |||
| EGGQ | 46.28 | -1.00 | -2.11% |
| NestYield Visionary ETF | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
GOOGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOGL has been closely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOOGL jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOOGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| GOOG - GOOGL | 99% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| DASH - GOOGL | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| CARG - GOOGL | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| META - GOOGL | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| RUM - GOOGL | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||