Advertisement
FCOM vs GOOGL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a StrongBuy and GOOGL is a Hold.
GOOGL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | GOOGL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FT | 8.14 | 0.04 | +0.49% |
| Franklin Universal Trust | |||
| SIXG | 66.28 | 0.16 | +0.25% |
| Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | |||
| VGT | 774.17 | 0.87 | +0.11% |
| Vanguard Information Technology ETF | |||
| PSCJ | 29.73 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF | |||
| CHY | 11.68 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| Calamos Convertible and High Income Fund | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||
GOOGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOGL has been closely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOOGL jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOOGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | 100% | -1.58% | ||
| GOOG - GOOGL | 99% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| DASH - GOOGL | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| META - GOOGL | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| CARG - GOOGL | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| SNAP - GOOGL | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.77% | ||
More | ||||