Advertisement
FCOM vs GOOGL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a StrongBuy and GOOGL is a Buy.
GOOGL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | GOOGL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EDEN | 116.08 | 1.05 | +0.91% |
| iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | |||
| VTWV | 163.41 | 0.59 | +0.36% |
| Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | |||
| LDDR | 84.10 | 0.07 | +0.09% |
| Stone Ridge Trust Stone Ridge 2035 Term Income ETF | |||
| SPLG | 80.00 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | |||
| DWMF | 32.90 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| WisdomTree International Mltfctr | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
GOOGL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOGL has been closely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOOGL jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOOGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| GOOG - GOOGL | 99% Closely correlated | -0.00% | ||
| DASH - GOOGL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| CARG - GOOGL | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| META - GOOGL | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| RDDT - GOOGL | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
More | ||||