Advertisement
FCOM vs GOOG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and GOOG is a Hold.
GOOG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FCOM | GOOG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 77% | 9 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MNDFX | 8.75 | 0.03 | +0.34% |
| Manning & Napier Disciplined Value I | |||
| AWACX | 25.01 | 0.05 | +0.20% |
| AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy C | |||
| FITLX | 29.52 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index | |||
| FIQDX | 8.83 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret Z | |||
| VTPSX | 159.24 | -0.08 | -0.05% |
| Vanguard Total Intl Stock Idx InstlPls | |||
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.29% | ||
More | ||||
GOOG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOOG has been closely correlated with GOOGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOOG jumps, then GOOGL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| GOOGL - GOOG | 99% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| META - GOOG | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| DASH - GOOG | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| CARG - GOOG | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| SNAP - GOOG | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||