Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs FDCF
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs FDCF
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$70.28
Change+$0.33 (+0.47%)
Volume$106.85K
Net Assets1.78B
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$48.07
Change+$0.22 (+0.46%)
Volume$42.57K
Net Assets91.57M
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. FDCF commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Buy and FDCF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.78B vs. FDCF (91.6M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: FDCF (27.309) vs FCOM (20.312). FCOM was incepted earlier than FDCF: FCOM (12 years) vs FDCF (5 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover FCOM (21.00) vs FCOM (21.00).
| FCOM | FDCF | FCOM / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 20.312 | 27.309 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 1.78B | 91.6M | 1,942% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.50 | 17% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 23.00 | 91% |
| Yield | 0.85 | 0.03 | 2,492% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| META - FCOM | 86% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| LYV - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| META - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | +3.49% | ||
More | ||||