Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs FDCF
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs FDCF
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$72.04
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.86B
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$47.11
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
Volume$304
Net Assets103.67M
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. FDCF commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.86B vs. FDCF (104M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: FDCF (25.029) vs FCOM (23.781). FCOM was incepted earlier than FDCF: FCOM (12 years) vs FDCF (6 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover FCOM (13.00) vs FCOM (13.00).
| FCOM | FDCF | FCOM / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 23.781 | 25.029 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 104M | 1,785% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.50 | 17% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 23.00 | 57% |
| Yield | 0.86 | 0.03 | 2,527% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 77% | 14 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| META - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||