Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCOM vs FDCF
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison
Open Charts FCOM vs FDCF
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
Price$73.40
Change-$0.29 (-0.39%)
Volume$76.6K
Net Assets1.92B
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
Price$48.24
Change-$0.68 (-1.39%)
Volume$15.49K
Net Assets106.35M
FCOM vs FDCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCOM vs. FDCF commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCOM is a Hold and FDCF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCOM has more net assets: 1.92B vs. FDCF (106M). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than FCOM: FDCF (0.339) vs FCOM (0.164). FCOM was incepted earlier than FDCF: FCOM (12 years) vs FDCF (6 years). FCOM (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FDCF (0.50). FDCF has a higher turnover FCOM (13.00) vs FCOM (13.00).
| FCOM | FDCF | FCOM / FDCF | |
| Gain YTD | 0.164 | 0.339 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 106M | 1,813% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.50 | 17% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 23.00 | 57% |
| Yield | 0.88 | 0.03 | 2,639% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FCOM | FDCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| META - FCOM | 85% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| NWSA - FCOM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
More | ||||
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| META - FDCF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| NVDA - FDCF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 73% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| NET - FDCF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
More | ||||