Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGEBX
FCNTX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.02
Change+$1.07 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
FCNTX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FCNTX (176B). FCNTX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FCNTX (0.05) vs RGEBX (0.00). FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FCNTX (58 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.63). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FCNTX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.71 vs. RGEBX (11.57). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.91 vs. RGEBX (40.41).
| FCNTX | RGEBX | FCNTX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.09 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.833 | 19.009 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 176B | 337B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.71 | 11.57 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.61 | 70.34 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.91 | 40.41 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.39 | 90.63 | 154% |