Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGACX
FCNTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
FCNTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FCNTX (171B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: RGACX (0.07) vs FCNTX (0.05). FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCNTX (58 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.63). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCNTX (0) vs RGACX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.79 vs. RGACX (12.22). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.60 vs. RGACX (45.63).
| FCNTX | RGACX | FCNTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.166 | 17.183 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171B | 337B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.07 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.79 | 12.22 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.48 | 71.26 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.60 | 45.63 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.35 | 111.15 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers