Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNTX vs RGACX
FCNTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNTX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FCNTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNTX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNTX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FCNTX (171B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FCNTX: RGACX (0.07) vs FCNTX (0.05). FCNTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCNTX (58 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FCNTX (0.63). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNTX (18.00). FCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCNTX (0) vs RGACX (250). FCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.14 vs. RGACX (17.83). FCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| FCNTX | RGACX | FCNTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.311 | 15.516 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171B | 332B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.07 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.14 | 17.83 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.62 | 58.53 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.21 | 40.02 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.83 | 95.93 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement