Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNSX vs TRAMX
FCNSX vs TRAMX Comparison
Open Charts FCNSX vs TRAMX
Fidelity Series Canada
Price$18.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.39B
T. Rowe Price Africa & Middle East
Price$11.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.64M
FCNSX vs TRAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNSX vs. TRAMX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNSX is a StrongBuy and TRAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCNSX has more cash in the bank: 6.39B vs. TRAMX (102M). TRAMX pays higher dividends than FCNSX: TRAMX (4.73) vs FCNSX (2.19). FCNSX was incepted earlier than TRAMX: FCNSX (8 years) vs TRAMX (18 years). TRAMX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FCNSX (0.00). TRAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.10 vs. FCNSX (9.00). FCNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRAMX: FCNSX (0) vs TRAMX (2500). FCNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.86 vs. TRAMX (9.92). FCNSX return over 5 years is better than : 105.82 vs. TRAMX (82.64).
| FCNSX | TRAMX | FCNSX / TRAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.77 | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.110 | 14.648 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.39B | 102M | 6,261% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.19 | 4.73 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.86 | 9.92 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.31 | 23.96 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.82 | 82.64 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement