Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGEBX
FCNKX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$24.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.54B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
FCNKX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FCNKX (176B). FCNKX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FCNKX (0.10) vs RGEBX (0.00). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FCNKX (17 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.56). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FCNKX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.97 vs. RGEBX (10.77). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 44.37 vs. RGEBX (36.57).
| FCNKX | RGEBX | FCNKX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.540 | 17.511 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 176B | 336B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.97 | 10.77 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.19 | 69.56 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.37 | 36.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.83 | 92.27 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement