Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGACX
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGACX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$24.73
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.15B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FCNKX (171B). FCNKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCNKX (0.10) vs RGACX (0.07). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCNKX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.56). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCNKX (0) vs RGACX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. RGACX (12.22). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 52.90 vs. RGACX (45.63).
| FCNKX | RGACX | FCNKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.919 | 17.183 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 171B | 336B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.07 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.55 | 12.22 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.46 | 71.26 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.90 | 45.63 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.37 | 111.15 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement