Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNKX vs RGACX
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCNKX vs RGACX
Fidelity Contrafund K
Price$24.04
Change-$0.29 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.37B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.29
Change-$1.00 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.64B
FCNKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNKX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNKX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. FCNKX (173B). FCNKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCNKX (0.10) vs RGACX (0.07). FCNKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCNKX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FCNKX (0.56). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FCNKX (18.00). FCNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCNKX (0) vs RGACX (250). FCNKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.84 vs. RGACX (11.81). FCNKX return over 5 years is better than : 47.81 vs. RGACX (38.00).
| FCNKX | RGACX | FCNKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.308 | 12.918 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173B | 330B | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.07 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.84 | 11.81 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.57 | 43.79 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.81 | 38.00 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.50 | 93.80 | 160% |