FCNCP
Price
$21.89
Change
+$0.20 (+0.92%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
HBANL
Price
$25.84
Change
+$0.31 (+1.21%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCNCP vs HBANL

Header iconFCNCP vs HBANL Comparison
Open Charts FCNCP vs HBANLBanner chart's image
First Citizens BancShares
Price$21.89
Change+$0.20 (+0.92%)
Volume$13.05K
CapitalizationN/A
Huntington Bancshares
Price$25.84
Change+$0.31 (+1.21%)
Volume$22.96K
CapitalizationN/A
FCNCP vs HBANL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCNCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBANL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCNCP vs. HBANL commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNCP is a StrongBuy and HBANL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FCNCP: $21.90 vs. HBANL: $25.84)
Brand notoriety: FCNCP and HBANL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCNCP: 60% vs. HBANL: 126%
Market capitalization -- FCNCP: $0 vs. HBANL: $0
FCNCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. HBANL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCNCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBANL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCNCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBANL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCNCP and HBANL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCNCP’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBANL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCNCP’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HBANL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCP is a better buy in the short-term than HBANL.

Price Growth

FCNCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.36% price change this week, while HBANL (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBANL YTD gains are higher at: 5.238 vs. FCNCP (2.909). HBANL has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. FCNCP (889M). HBANL has less debt than FCNCP: HBANL (17.9B) vs FCNCP (38B).
FCNCPHBANLFCNCP / HBANL
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.9095.23856%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A7.69B-
Total Cash889M1.6B56%
Total Debt38B17.9B212%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNCPHBANL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
23%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCNCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBANL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAIA1.540.05
+3.36%
MAIA Biotechnology
STRK95.100.30
+0.32%
MicroStrategy Inc
VACH10.42N/A
N/A
Voyager Acquisition Corp.
TRS38.73-0.53
-1.35%
TriMas Corp
LNC42.11-1.11
-2.57%
Lincoln National Corp

FCNCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCP has been loosely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCNCP jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCNCP
1D Price
Change %
FCNCP100%
+0.90%
HBANP - FCNCP
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
FCNCO - FCNCP
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
TCBIO - FCNCP
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
FITBO - FCNCP
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
HBANL - FCNCP
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
More

HBANL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANL has been loosely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBANL jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBANL
1D Price
Change %
HBANL100%
+1.21%
HBANP - HBANL
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
FCNCP - HBANL
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
FITBO - HBANL
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
OZKAP - HBANL
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
TCBIO - HBANL
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More