FCNCP
Price
$20.28
Change
+$0.20 (+1.00%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
HBANL
Price
$24.73
Change
+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

FCNCP vs HBANL

Header iconFCNCP vs HBANL Comparison
Open Charts FCNCP vs HBANLBanner chart's image
First Citizens BancShares
Price$20.28
Change+$0.20 (+1.00%)
Volume$23.14K
CapitalizationN/A
Huntington Bancshares
Price$24.73
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$30.81K
CapitalizationN/A
FCNCP vs HBANL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCNCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBANL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCNCP vs. HBANL commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNCP is a Hold and HBANL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FCNCP: $20.28 vs. HBANL: $24.73)
Brand notoriety: FCNCP and HBANL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCNCP: 76% vs. HBANL: 120%
Market capitalization -- FCNCP: $0 vs. HBANL: $0
FCNCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. HBANL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCNCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBANL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCNCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HBANL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCP is a better buy in the long-term than HBANL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCNCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBANL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCNCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HBANL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FCNCP and HBANL are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FCNCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.11% price change this week, while HBANL (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBANL YTD gains are higher at: -1.034 vs. FCNCP (-7.610). HBANL has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. FCNCP (908M). HBANL has less debt than FCNCP: HBANL (12.4B) vs FCNCP (37.6B). FCNCP has higher revenues than HBANL: FCNCP (8.78B) vs HBANL (7.36B).
FCNCPHBANLFCNCP / HBANL
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.610-1.034736%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue8.78B7.36B119%
Total Cash908M1.56B58%
Total Debt37.6B12.4B303%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNCPHBANL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
24%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
27%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCNCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBANL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

FCNCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCP has been loosely correlated with FCNCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCNCP jumps, then FCNCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCNCP
1D Price
Change %
FCNCP100%
+1.00%
FCNCO - FCNCP
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
HBANP - FCNCP
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
FITBO - FCNCP
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
OZKAP - FCNCP
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
HBANL - FCNCP
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More

HBANL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANL has been loosely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBANL jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBANL
1D Price
Change %
HBANL100%
+0.08%
HBANP - HBANL
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
FITBO - HBANL
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
FCNCP - HBANL
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
TCBIO - HBANL
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
ONBPO - HBANL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
More