FCNCO
Price
$21.95
Change
+$0.10 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
OZKAP
Price
$16.22
Change
+$0.08 (+0.50%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCNCO vs OZKAP

Header iconFCNCO vs OZKAP Comparison
Open Charts FCNCO vs OZKAPBanner chart's image
First Citizens BancShares
Price$21.95
Change+$0.10 (+0.46%)
Volume$18.06K
CapitalizationN/A
Bank OZK
Price$16.22
Change+$0.08 (+0.50%)
Volume$12.56K
CapitalizationN/A
FCNCO vs OZKAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCNCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OZKAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCNCO vs. OZKAP commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNCO is a Hold and OZKAP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FCNCO: $21.95 vs. OZKAP: $16.22)
Brand notoriety: FCNCO and OZKAP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCNCO: 102% vs. OZKAP: 35%
Market capitalization -- FCNCO: $0 vs. OZKAP: $0
FCNCO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. OZKAP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCNCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOZKAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCNCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OZKAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCNCO and OZKAP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCNCO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OZKAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCNCO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OZKAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCNCO is a better buy in the short-term than OZKAP.

Price Growth

FCNCO (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.81% price change this week, while OZKAP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OZKAP YTD gains are higher at: 5.090 vs. FCNCO (0.880). FCNCO has more cash in the bank: 908M vs. OZKAP (828M). OZKAP has less debt than FCNCO: OZKAP (1.28B) vs FCNCO (37.6B). FCNCO has higher revenues than OZKAP: FCNCO (8.78B) vs OZKAP (1.56B).
FCNCOOZKAPFCNCO / OZKAP
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.8805.09017%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue8.78B1.56B562%
Total Cash908M828M110%
Total Debt37.6B1.28B2,949%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNCOOZKAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCNCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OZKAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PORTO.X0.8454820.003498
+0.42%
FC Porto Fan Token cryptocurrency
ALICE.X0.395917-0.008469
-2.09%
MyNeighborAlice cryptocurrency
GES11.46-0.42
-3.54%
Guess
LYFT14.78-0.66
-4.27%
Lyft
ONEW13.81-1.52
-9.89%
OneWater Marine

FCNCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCO has been loosely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCNCO jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCNCO
1D Price
Change %
FCNCO100%
+0.46%
FITBO - FCNCO
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
FCNCP - FCNCO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
HBANP - FCNCO
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
OZKAP - FCNCO
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
WAFDP - FCNCO
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More

OZKAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OZKAP has been loosely correlated with HBANP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OZKAP jumps, then HBANP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OZKAP
1D Price
Change %
OZKAP100%
+0.50%
HBANP - OZKAP
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
FITBO - OZKAP
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
FCNCP - OZKAP
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
TCBIO - OZKAP
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
FCNCO - OZKAP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
More