Advertisement
FCNCO vs MBINM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNCO is a Hold and MBINM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCNCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FCNCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCNCO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FCNCO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FCNCO (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.81% price change this week, while MBINM (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.27%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.40% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FCNCO | MBINM | FCNCO / MBINM | |
| Capitalization | N/A | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.880 | 1.966 | 45% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 8.78B | 559M | 1,570% |
| Total Cash | 908M | 10.6M | 8,566% |
| Total Debt | 37.6B | 964M | 3,900% |
| FCNCO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DMB | 10.04 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
| BNY Mellon Municipal | |||
| NMS | 11.35 | -0.03 | -0.23% |
| Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
| EPP | 49.25 | -0.52 | -1.04% |
| iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF | |||
| EYLD | 35.52 | -0.47 | -1.31% |
| Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| GARP | 57.71 | -0.96 | -1.64% |
| iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | |||
FCNCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCNCO has been loosely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCNCO jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCNCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCNCO | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| FITBO - FCNCO | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| FCNCP - FCNCO | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| HBANP - FCNCO | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| OZKAP - FCNCO | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| WAFDP - FCNCO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||
MBINM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with FITBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then FITBI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBINM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBINM | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| FITBI - MBINM | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| WSBCP - MBINM | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| OZKAP - MBINM | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| FITBO - MBINM | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| FCNCO - MBINM | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
More | ||||