Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCNAX vs FDLSX
FCNAX vs FDLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCNAX vs FDLSX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret A
Price$43.53
Change-$0.56 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets479.57M
Fidelity Select Leisure
Price$19.92
Change-$0.41 (-2.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets658.09M
FCNAX vs FDLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCNAX vs. FDLSX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCNAX is a Hold and FDLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDLSX has more cash in the bank: 658M vs. FCNAX (480M). FDLSX pays higher dividends than FCNAX: FDLSX (0.36) vs FCNAX (0.00). FCNAX was incepted earlier than FDLSX: FCNAX (29 years) vs FDLSX (41 years). FCNAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FDLSX (0.70). FDLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FCNAX (25.00). FCNAX (0) and FDLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCNAX (500) and FDLSX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FCNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.97 vs. FDLSX (4.56). FDLSX return over 5 years is better than : 56.95 vs. FCNAX (40.74).
| FCNAX | FDLSX | FCNAX / FDLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.70 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.717 | -3.019 | 256% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 480M | 658M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.97 | 4.56 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.73 | 54.18 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.74 | 56.95 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.62 | 44.12 | 253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement