Advertisement
FCN vs VRSK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCN is a Hold and VRSK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRSK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VRSK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- VRSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FCN (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -1.12% price change this week, while VRSK (@Data Processing Services) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
FCN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
VRSK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Data Processing Services (-1.50% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| FCN | VRSK | FCN / VRSK | |
| Capitalization | 5.36B | 37.4B | 14% |
| EBITDA | 378M | 1.64B | 23% |
| Gain YTD | -13.415 | -2.457 | 546% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.31 | 41.59 | 56% |
| Revenue | 3.66B | 2.99B | 123% |
| Total Cash | 153M | 629M | 24% |
| Total Debt | 687M | 3.43B | 20% |
FCN | VRSK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FCN's Valuation (60) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (90) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FCN (58) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's SMR Rating (10) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCN (62) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCN’s over the last 12 months.
FCN's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (63) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.
VRSK's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FCN (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.
| FCN | VRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 19 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TGVRX | 31.63 | 0.30 | +0.96% |
| Thornburg International Equity R3 | |||
| MLOZX | 8.81 | 0.07 | +0.80% |
| Cohen & Steers Future of Energy Z | |||
| BRWJX | 28.02 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| MFS Blended Research Growth Eq I | |||
| RFNCX | 89.76 | -0.35 | -0.39% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs R3 | |||
| PMFJX | 21.39 | -0.13 | -0.60% |
| Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index J | |||
FCN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCN has been loosely correlated with KICK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCN jumps, then KICK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCN | 100% | -2.12% | ||
| KICK - FCN | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CBZ - FCN | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| HURN - FCN | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| MMS - FCN | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
| VRSK - FCN | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||
VRSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRSK has been loosely correlated with CTAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRSK jumps, then CTAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRSK | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| CTAS - VRSK | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| TRI - VRSK | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| RELX - VRSK | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| EFX - VRSK | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| CBZ - VRSK | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||