FCN
Price
$164.96
Change
-$0.40 (-0.24%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.09B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRSK
Price
$217.68
Change
+$4.77 (+2.24%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
30.34B
102 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCN vs VRSK

Header iconFCN vs VRSK Comparison
Open Charts FCN vs VRSKBanner chart's image
FTI Consulting
Price$164.96
Change-$0.40 (-0.24%)
Volume$249.49K
Capitalization5.09B
Verisk Analytics
Price$217.68
Change+$4.77 (+2.24%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization30.34B
FCN vs VRSK Comparison Chart in %
FCN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCN vs. VRSK commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCN is a StrongBuy and VRSK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FCN: $165.36 vs. VRSK: $212.91)
Brand notoriety: FCN and VRSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Data Processing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCN: 62% vs. VRSK: 83%
Market capitalization -- FCN: $5.09B vs. VRSK: $30.34B
FCN [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $5.09B. VRSK’s [@Data Processing Services] market capitalization is $30.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $39.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRSK is a better buy in the long-term than FCN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VRSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRSK is a better buy in the short-term than FCN.

Price Growth

FCN (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -0.87% price change this week, while VRSK (@Data Processing Services) price change was -0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

VRSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (-1.39% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRSK($30.3B) has a higher market cap than FCN($5.09B). VRSK has higher P/E ratio than FCN: VRSK (33.49) vs FCN (21.12). FCN YTD gains are higher at: -13.483 vs. VRSK (-22.334). VRSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.64B vs. FCN (378M). FCN has less debt than VRSK: FCN (687M) vs VRSK (3.43B). FCN has higher revenues than VRSK: FCN (3.66B) vs VRSK (2.99B).
FCNVRSKFCN / VRSK
Capitalization5.09B30.3B17%
EBITDA378M1.64B23%
Gain YTD-13.483-22.33460%
P/E Ratio21.1233.4963%
Revenue3.66B2.99B123%
Total Cash153MN/A-
Total Debt687M3.43B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCN vs VRSK: Fundamental Ratings
FCN
VRSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7072
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5981
SMR RATING
1..100
6110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6065
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5477
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRSK's Valuation (55) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FCN (62) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.

FCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (81) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

VRSK's SMR Rating (10) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCN (61) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCN’s over the last 12 months.

FCN's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (65) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

FCN's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (77) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNVRSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EEMO18.090.16
+0.87%
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Mom ETF
MFEM23.270.10
+0.44%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Mlt-Fctr Emrg Mkts Eq ETF
EAGL31.790.04
+0.13%
Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF
DECM32.540.03
+0.09%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Dec
EPOL34.42-0.14
-0.41%
iShares MSCI Poland ETF

FCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCN has been loosely correlated with CBZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCN jumps, then CBZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCN
1D Price
Change %
FCN100%
+0.92%
CBZ - FCN
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
BCO - FCN
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
VRSK - FCN
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
MMS - FCN
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
MSA - FCN
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More

VRSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRSK has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRSK jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRSK
1D Price
Change %
VRSK100%
-1.10%
EXPO - VRSK
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
TRI - VRSK
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
CTAS - VRSK
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
ABM - VRSK
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
RELX - VRSK
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
More