FCN
Price
$175.27
Change
-$0.03 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:25 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.41B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRSK
Price
$223.63
Change
-$0.53 (-0.24%)
Updated
Jan 15, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.24B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCN vs VRSK

Header iconFCN vs VRSK Comparison
Open Charts FCN vs VRSKBanner chart's image
FTI Consulting
Price$175.27
Change-$0.03 (-0.02%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.41B
Verisk Analytics
Price$223.63
Change-$0.53 (-0.24%)
Volume$2.17K
Capitalization31.24B
FCN vs VRSK Comparison Chart in %
FCN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCN vs. VRSK commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCN is a Hold and VRSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FCN: $175.30 vs. VRSK: $224.16)
Brand notoriety: FCN and VRSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Data Processing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCN: 60% vs. VRSK: 87%
Market capitalization -- FCN: $5.41B vs. VRSK: $31.24B
FCN [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $5.41B. VRSK’s [@Data Processing Services] market capitalization is $31.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $40.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $5.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRSK is a better buy in the long-term than FCN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VRSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRSK is a better buy in the short-term than FCN.

Price Growth

FCN (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while VRSK (@Data Processing Services) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCN is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

VRSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (+3.36% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRSK($31.2B) has a higher market cap than FCN($5.41B). VRSK has higher P/E ratio than FCN: VRSK (34.48) vs FCN (22.45). FCN YTD gains are higher at: 2.617 vs. VRSK (0.210). VRSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.67B vs. FCN (408M). FCN has less debt than VRSK: FCN (736M) vs VRSK (4.89B). FCN has higher revenues than VRSK: FCN (3.69B) vs VRSK (3.03B).
FCNVRSKFCN / VRSK
Capitalization5.41B31.2B17%
EBITDA408M1.67B24%
Gain YTD2.6170.2101,245%
P/E Ratio22.4534.4865%
Revenue3.69B3.03B122%
Total Cash146MN/A-
Total Debt736M4.89B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCN vs VRSK: Fundamental Ratings
FCN
VRSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7564
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5277
SMR RATING
1..100
589
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5163
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5376
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VRSK's Valuation (58) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as FCN (63) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.

FCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (77) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

VRSK's SMR Rating (9) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCN (58) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that VRSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCN’s over the last 12 months.

FCN's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (63) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

FCN's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as VRSK (76) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to VRSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCNVRSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UVXY37.021.41
+3.96%
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures
BAMV33.510.24
+0.72%
Brookstone Value Stock ETF
ESIX32.80N/A
N/A
State Street® SPDR® S&P SmCap 600 ESGETF
DUKQ28.52-0.06
-0.20%
Ocean Park Domestic ETF
IMCG82.81-0.27
-0.32%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

FCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCN has been loosely correlated with CBZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCN jumps, then CBZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCN
1D Price
Change %
FCN100%
-0.78%
CBZ - FCN
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.64%
BCO - FCN
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
VRSK - FCN
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
MMS - FCN
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
MSA - FCN
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
More

VRSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRSK has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRSK jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRSK
1D Price
Change %
VRSK100%
+0.93%
EXPO - VRSK
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
TRI - VRSK
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
CTAS - VRSK
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
ABM - VRSK
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.00%
RELX - VRSK
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
More