It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FCN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHURN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FCN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HURN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FCN (@Data Processing Services) experienced а +0.06% price change this week, while HURN (@Data Processing Services) price change was +3.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +36.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.60%.
FCN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
HURN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
FCN | HURN | FCN / HURN | |
Capitalization | 5.46B | 2.45B | 223% |
EBITDA | 378M | 203M | 186% |
Gain YTD | -11.715 | 13.689 | -86% |
P/E Ratio | 23.77 | 24.65 | 96% |
Revenue | 3.66B | 1.59B | 230% |
Total Cash | 153M | 61M | 251% |
Total Debt | 687M | 694M | 99% |
FCN | HURN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HURN's Valuation (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FCN (61). This means that HURN’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.
HURN's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCN (58). This means that HURN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCN’s over the last 12 months.
HURN's SMR Rating (43) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FCN (62). This means that HURN’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.
HURN's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FCN (60). This means that HURN’s stock grew similarly to FCN’s over the last 12 months.
FCN's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as HURN (56). This means that FCN’s stock grew similarly to HURN’s over the last 12 months.
FCN | HURN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago39% | 3 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago48% | 3 days ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago47% | 3 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 4 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago43% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% | 3 days ago76% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JFNNX | 70.40 | 0.55 | +0.79% |
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences N | |||
RFNHX | 90.93 | 0.50 | +0.55% |
American Funds Fundamental Invs R5E | |||
MFWJX | 18.11 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
MFS Global Total Return R4 | |||
SSMGX | 70.03 | -0.03 | -0.04% |
Sit Small Cap Growth | |||
VLLIX | 45.81 | -0.07 | -0.15% |
Value Line Larger Companies Focus Instl |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCN has been loosely correlated with KICK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCN jumps, then KICK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FCN | 100% | +0.16% | ||
KICK - FCN | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CBZ - FCN | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
HURN - FCN | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.67% | ||
MMS - FCN | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
BCO - FCN | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HURN has been loosely correlated with GHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HURN jumps, then GHC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HURN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HURN | 100% | -2.67% | ||
GHC - HURN | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
LAUR - HURN | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
BCO - HURN | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
UTI - HURN | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
LOPE - HURN | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More |