FCMGF
Price
$8.93
Change
-$0.08 (-0.89%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
291.91M
TBCRF
Price
$5.61
Change
+$0.05 (+0.90%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
471.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCMGF vs TBCRF

Header iconFCMGF vs TBCRF Comparison
Open Charts FCMGF vs TBCRFBanner chart's image
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment
Price$8.93
Change-$0.08 (-0.89%)
Volume$600
Capitalization291.91M
Timbercreek Financial
Price$5.61
Change+$0.05 (+0.90%)
Volume$317
Capitalization471.47M
FCMGF vs TBCRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCMGF vs. TBCRF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCMGF is a Hold and TBCRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FCMGF: $8.93 vs. TBCRF: $5.61)
Brand notoriety: FCMGF and TBCRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCMGF: 48% vs. TBCRF: 5%
Market capitalization -- FCMGF: $291.91M vs. TBCRF: $471.47M
FCMGF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $291.91M. TBCRF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $471.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCMGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTBCRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TBCRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FCMGF and TBCRF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCMGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBCRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCMGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TBCRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FCMGF and TBCRF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FCMGF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while TBCRF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBCRF($471M) has a higher market cap than FCMGF($292M). FCMGF has higher P/E ratio than TBCRF: FCMGF (11.58) vs TBCRF (10.54). TBCRF YTD gains are higher at: 14.280 vs. FCMGF (5.994). FCMGF has less debt than TBCRF: FCMGF (183M) vs TBCRF (527M). TBCRF has higher revenues than FCMGF: TBCRF (165M) vs FCMGF (50.5M).
FCMGFTBCRFFCMGF / TBCRF
Capitalization292M471M62%
EBITDAN/A62.6M-
Gain YTD5.99414.28042%
P/E Ratio11.5810.54110%
Revenue50.5M165M31%
Total CashN/A1.3M-
Total Debt183M527M35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCMGF: Fundamental Ratings
FCMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCMGFTBCRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBCRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEQYX13.100.10
+0.77%
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income - Y
JSGCX25.960.19
+0.74%
JHancock U.S. Growth C
LGLUX53.360.20
+0.38%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R5
AFVZX22.560.03
+0.13%
Applied Finance Select Institutional
GEOSX14.27-0.02
-0.14%
Pear Tree Essex Environmental Opps Ins

FCMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCMGF and BRLGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCMGF and BRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCMGF
1D Price
Change %
FCMGF100%
-0.83%
BRLGF - FCMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
TBCRF - FCMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
CMPRF - FCMGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEEF - FCMGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
DVLN - FCMGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TBCRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBCRF and BRLGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBCRF and BRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBCRF
1D Price
Change %
TBCRF100%
+0.85%
BRLGF - TBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
EHMEF - TBCRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCMGF - TBCRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
AL - TBCRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
LZRFY - TBCRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.23%
More