Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLTX vs RYPAX
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs RYPAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M
Price$53.50
Change+$0.35 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs. RYPAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Buy and RYPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. RYPAX (7.13M). RYPAX pays higher dividends than FCLTX: RYPAX (0.50) vs FCLTX (0.00). FCLTX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLTX (29 years) vs RYPAX (28 years). RYPAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FCLTX (1.23). RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLTX (29.00). FCLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLTX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FCLTX (8.65) and RYPAX (8.49) have marching annual gain over last year. FCLTX return over 5 years is better than : 31.68 vs. RYPAX (-11.76).
| FCLTX | RYPAX | FCLTX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.64 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.69 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.960 | 11.878 | 193% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 7.13M | 22,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.65 | 8.49 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.08 | 9.60 | 542% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.68 | -11.76 | -269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.80 | 36.03 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement