Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLTX vs RYPAX
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLTX vs RYPAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M
Price$57.67
Change+$4.91 (+9.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
FCLTX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLTX vs. RYPAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLTX is a Buy and RYPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLTX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. RYPAX (6.3M). RYPAX pays higher dividends than FCLTX: RYPAX (0.06) vs FCLTX (0.00). FCLTX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLTX (29 years) vs RYPAX (28 years). RYPAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FCLTX (1.23). RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLTX (29.00). FCLTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLTX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FCLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.09 vs. RYPAX (14.89). FCLTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.40 vs. RYPAX (-17.49).
| FCLTX | RYPAX | FCLTX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.64 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.69 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.523 | 3.888 | 193% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 6.3M | 27,621% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.09 | 14.89 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.04 | 17.27 | 365% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.40 | -17.49 | -242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.06 | 63.12 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement