FCLIF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.02 (-9.09%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
15.29M
MMILF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
374.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCLIF vs MMILF

Header iconFCLIF vs MMILF Comparison
Open Charts FCLIF vs MMILFBanner chart's image
Full Circle Lithium
Price$0.20
Change-$0.02 (-9.09%)
Volume$12.87K
Capitalization15.29M
Metro Mining
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization374.89M
FCLIF vs MMILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCLIF vs. MMILF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLIF is a Hold and MMILF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FCLIF: $0.20 vs. MMILF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: FCLIF and MMILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCLIF: 47% vs. MMILF: 6%
Market capitalization -- FCLIF: $15.29M vs. MMILF: $374.89M
FCLIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.29M. MMILF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $374.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCLIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMILF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCLIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMILF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMILF is a better buy in the long-term than FCLIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCLIF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMILF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCLIF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MMILF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCLIF is a better buy in the short-term than MMILF.

Price Growth

FCLIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MMILF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMILF($375M) has a higher market cap than FCLIF($15.3M). MMILF YTD gains are higher at: 83.150 vs. FCLIF (23.906). MMILF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 132M vs. FCLIF (-2.38M). MMILF has higher revenues than FCLIF: MMILF (371M) vs FCLIF (600K).
FCLIFMMILFFCLIF / MMILF
Capitalization15.3M375M4%
EBITDA-2.38M132M-2%
Gain YTD23.90683.15029%
P/E RatioN/A3.33-
Revenue600K371M0%
Total Cash722KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCLIFMMILF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACWIX19.320.28
+1.47%
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth I
FIJFX92.471.10
+1.20%
Fidelity Advisor Materials Z
JVAIX40.100.37
+0.93%
JPMorgan Value Advantage L
WSEFX38.250.23
+0.60%
Boston Trust Walden Equity
FEBCX15.390.08
+0.52%
First Eagle Global Income Builder C

FCLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCLIF and MMILF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCLIF and MMILF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCLIF
1D Price
Change %
FCLIF100%
N/A
MMILF - FCLIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VLTLF - FCLIF
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
EVKRF - FCLIF
8%
Poorly correlated
+6.13%
MLPNF - FCLIF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.88%
LZM - FCLIF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.56%
More

MMILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMILF and VDOMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMILF and VDOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMILF
1D Price
Change %
MMILF100%
N/A
VDOMF - MMILF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCLIF - MMILF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COPAF - MMILF
14%
Poorly correlated
-7.94%
DETRF - MMILF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
METOF - MMILF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.56%
More