Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLAX vs RYTSX
FCLAX vs RYTSX Comparison
Open Charts FCLAX vs RYTSX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
Price$54.49
Change+$0.15 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets805.81M
FCLAX vs RYTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLAX vs. RYTSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLAX is a Buy and RYTSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLAX has more cash in the bank: 806M vs. RYTSX (6.16M). RYTSX pays higher dividends than FCLAX: RYTSX (0.51) vs FCLAX (0.14). FCLAX was incepted earlier than RYTSX: FCLAX (29 years) vs RYTSX (21 years). RYTSX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FCLAX (0.98). RYTSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLAX (29.00). FCLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RYTSX (5%) vs RYTSX (5%). FCLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYTSX: FCLAX (0) vs RYTSX (2500). FCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.24 vs. RYTSX (16.31). FCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.85 vs. RYTSX (4.50).
| FCLAX | RYTSX | FCLAX / RYTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.63 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.68 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.613 | 3.962 | 495% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 121% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 6.16M | 13,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.51 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.24 | 16.31 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.89 | -3.23 | -1,856% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.85 | 4.50 | 1,130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.09 | 30.01 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement