Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLAX vs RYTSX
FCLAX vs RYTSX Comparison
Open Charts FCLAX vs RYTSX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
Price$54.29
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets806.13M
FCLAX vs RYTSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLAX vs. RYTSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLAX is a Hold and RYTSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLAX has more cash in the bank: 806M vs. RYTSX (6.05M). RYTSX pays higher dividends than FCLAX: RYTSX (0.54) vs FCLAX (0.14). FCLAX was incepted earlier than RYTSX: FCLAX (29 years) vs RYTSX (21 years). RYTSX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FCLAX (0.98). RYTSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLAX (29.00). FCLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than RYTSX (5%) vs RYTSX (5%). FCLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYTSX: FCLAX (0) vs RYTSX (2500). FCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.52 vs. RYTSX (14.10). FCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. RYTSX (5.84).
| FCLAX | RYTSX | FCLAX / RYTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.65 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.68 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.128 | 2.130 | 898% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 121% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 6.05M | 13,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.54 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.52 | 14.10 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.87 | -7.57 | -712% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.83 | 5.84 | 870% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.94 | 30.19 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement