Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLAX vs RYPAX
FCLAX vs RYPAX Comparison
Open Charts FCLAX vs RYPAX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
Price$54.34
Change-$0.22 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets805.81M
FCLAX vs RYPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLAX vs. RYPAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLAX is a Buy and RYPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLAX has more cash in the bank: 806M vs. RYPAX (6.21M). RYPAX pays higher dividends than FCLAX: RYPAX (0.54) vs FCLAX (0.14). FCLAX was incepted earlier than RYPAX: FCLAX (29 years) vs RYPAX (27 years). RYPAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FCLAX (0.98). RYPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FCLAX (29.00). FCLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYPAX: FCLAX (0) vs RYPAX (2500). FCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.64 vs. RYPAX (13.29). FCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.52 vs. RYPAX (2.14).
| FCLAX | RYPAX | FCLAX / RYPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.64 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.69 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.613 | 3.530 | 556% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 6.21M | 12,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.54 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.64 | 13.29 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.28 | 1.06 | 6,254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.52 | 2.14 | 2,360% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.08 | 27.95 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement