Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLAX vs FSRFX
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLAX vs FSRFX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
Price$50.22
Change-$0.62 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets714.15M
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$97.83
Change-$1.74 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465.99M
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLAX vs. FSRFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLAX is a Buy and FSRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLAX has more cash in the bank: 714M vs. FSRFX (466M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLAX: FSRFX (1.36) vs FCLAX (0.15). FCLAX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLAX (29 years) vs FSRFX (39 years). FCLAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). FCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FCLAX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. FSRFX (-6.18). FCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.72 vs. FSRFX (46.46).
| FCLAX | FSRFX | FCLAX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.544 | -5.570 | -189% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 714M | 466M | 153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.36 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | -6.18 | -263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.91 | 11.73 | 553% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.72 | 46.46 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.05 | 22.16 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers