Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLAX vs FSRFX
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLAX vs FSRFX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
Price$54.34
Change-$0.22 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets805.81M
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$105.40
Change-$0.14 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets481.83M
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLAX vs. FSRFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLAX is a Buy and FSRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLAX has more cash in the bank: 806M vs. FSRFX (482M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLAX: FSRFX (1.25) vs FCLAX (0.14). FCLAX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLAX (29 years) vs FSRFX (39 years). FCLAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). FCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FCLAX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.64 vs. FSRFX (-0.67). FCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.52 vs. FSRFX (29.55).
| FCLAX | FSRFX | FCLAX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.613 | 1.737 | 1,129% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 482M | 167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.25 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.64 | -0.67 | -3,520% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.28 | 11.63 | 570% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.52 | 29.55 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.08 | 36.61 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers