Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCLAX vs FSRFX
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison
Open Charts FCLAX vs FSRFX
Fidelity Advisor Industrials A
Price$53.42
Change+$0.61 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets759.97M
Fidelity Select Transportation
Price$105.50
Change+$0.46 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets478.57M
FCLAX vs FSRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCLAX vs. FSRFX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCLAX is a Buy and FSRFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCLAX has more cash in the bank: 760M vs. FSRFX (479M). FSRFX pays higher dividends than FCLAX: FSRFX (1.31) vs FCLAX (0.14). FCLAX was incepted earlier than FSRFX: FCLAX (29 years) vs FSRFX (39 years). FCLAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSRFX (0.69). FCLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSRFX (22.00). FCLAX (0) and FSRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.00 vs. FSRFX (-0.49). FCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.68 vs. FSRFX (53.78).
| FCLAX | FSRFX | FCLAX / FSRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.587 | 1.833 | 959% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 760M | 479M | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.31 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.00 | -0.49 | -4,857% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.26 | 20.96 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.68 | 53.78 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.66 | 35.74 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers