Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCKTX vs RCNTX
FCKTX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCKTX vs. RCNTX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCKTX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCKTX (17.2B) and RCNTX (17.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCKTX pays higher dividends than RCNTX: FCKTX (1.06) vs RCNTX (0.52). FCKTX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: FCKTX (8 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). RCNTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FCKTX (0.39). FCKTX (5.00) and RCNTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCKTX: RCNTX (250) vs FCKTX (1000000). FCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.60 vs. RCNTX (12.84). FCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.50 vs. RCNTX (48.98).
| FCKTX | RCNTX | FCKTX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.03 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.03 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.435 | 11.067 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2B | 17.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.52 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.60 | 12.84 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.79 | 43.68 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.50 | 48.98 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers