Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCKTX vs RBNTX
FCKTX vs RBNTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCKTX vs. RBNTX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCKTX is a Hold and RBNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCKTX (18.5B) and RBNTX (18.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCKTX pays higher dividends than RBNTX: FCKTX (0.97) vs RBNTX (0.15). FCKTX was incepted earlier than RBNTX: FCKTX (9 years) vs RBNTX (11 years). RBNTX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FCKTX (0.39). FCKTX (5.00) and RBNTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCKTX: RBNTX (250) vs FCKTX (1000000). FCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. RBNTX (13.56). FCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.14 vs. RBNTX (36.28).
| FCKTX | RBNTX | FCKTX / RBNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.48 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.48 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.300 | 20.012 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 18.5B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.15 | 636% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.90 | 13.56 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.13 | 47.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.14 | 36.28 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 118.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement