Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCJTX vs TRRNX
FCJTX vs TRRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCJTX vs. TRRNX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCJTX is a Hold and TRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCJTX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. TRRNX (11.1B). TRRNX pays higher dividends than FCJTX: TRRNX (1.19) vs FCJTX (1.11). FCJTX was incepted earlier than TRRNX: FCJTX (8 years) vs TRRNX (19 years). TRRNX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FCJTX (0.39). TRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.60 vs. FCJTX (5.00). TRRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCJTX: TRRNX (2500) vs FCJTX (1000000). FCJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. TRRNX (12.10). FCJTX (49.69) and TRRNX (48.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCJTX | TRRNX | FCJTX / TRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.64 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.64 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.459 | 9.603 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 11.1B | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.19 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.54 | 12.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.29 | 40.30 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.69 | 48.09 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers