Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$17.14
Change+$0.06 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.82M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$16.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.63M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 896M vs. FCIVX (152M). TOLZX pays higher dividends than FCIVX: TOLZX (2.97) vs FCIVX (2.70). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLZX (11 years). TOLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.51 vs. FCIVX (-4.66). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.56 vs. FCIVX (13.48).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.627 | 13.844 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 152M | 896M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.97 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.66 | 3.51 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.62 | 23.98 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.48 | 22.56 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement