Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.34M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$16.49
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets898.36M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 898M vs. FCIVX (85.3M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLZX: FCIVX (3.11) vs TOLZX (2.57). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLZX (11 years). TOLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. FCIVX (-2.08). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : 17.52 vs. FCIVX (8.80).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.689 | 10.426 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.3M | 898M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 2.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.08 | 10.02 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.41 | 0.24 | -3,055% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.80 | 17.52 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 41.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement