Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLZX
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLZX
MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$13.15
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.67M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure R6
Price$15.37
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets807.46M
FCIVX vs TOLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLZX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLZX has more cash in the bank: 807M vs. FCIVX (149M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLZX: FCIVX (2.79) vs TOLZX (2.45). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLZX: FCIVX (10 years) vs TOLZX (11 years). TOLZX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.92). TOLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLZX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.56 vs. FCIVX (-3.58). TOLZX return over 5 years is better than : 6.60 vs. FCIVX (-14.62).
| FCIVX | TOLZX | FCIVX / TOLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.01 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.05 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.921 | 0.326 | 282% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 807M | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.45 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.58 | 4.56 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.21 | 5.30 | -363% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.62 | 6.60 | -221% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement