Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$13.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.72M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$15.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets844.79M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and TOLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 845M vs. FCIVX (149M). TOLSX (2.68) and FCIVX (2.64) have matching dividends . FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (18 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.92). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. FCIVX (-5.61). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 7.35 vs. FCIVX (-15.03).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.369 | 2.925 | -184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 845M | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.68 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.61 | 2.65 | -211% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.05 | 8.62 | -198% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.03 | 7.35 | -204% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement