Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.34M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets898.36M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 898M vs. FCIVX (85.3M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLSX: FCIVX (3.11) vs TOLSX (2.32). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.80 vs. FCIVX (-2.08). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 16.74 vs. FCIVX (8.80).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.689 | 10.333 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.3M | 898M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 2.32 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.08 | 9.80 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.41 | -0.11 | 7,017% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.80 | 16.74 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.72 | - |