Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.44
Change-$0.10 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.89M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.62
Change-$0.12 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.36M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 888M vs. FCIVX (96.9M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLSX: FCIVX (3.00) vs TOLSX (2.10). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (19.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.76 vs. FCIVX (1.66). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.34 vs. FCIVX (11.94).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.431 | 10.111 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.9M | 888M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 2.10 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.66 | 13.76 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.45 | 7.12 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.94 | 20.34 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers