Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$13.15
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.67M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$15.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets807.46M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Hold and TOLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 807M vs. FCIVX (149M). FCIVX pays higher dividends than TOLSX: FCIVX (2.79) vs TOLSX (2.15). FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (10 years) vs TOLSX (18 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.92). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.38 vs. FCIVX (-3.58). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 5.86 vs. FCIVX (-14.62).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.921 | 0.326 | 282% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 807M | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.15 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.58 | 4.38 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.21 | 4.90 | -392% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.62 | 5.86 | -249% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement