Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs TOLSX
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs TOLSX
MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$16.96
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.08M
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
Price$16.68
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets869.42M
FCIVX vs TOLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. TOLSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a StrongBuy and TOLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLSX has more cash in the bank: 869M vs. FCIVX (150M). TOLSX (2.68) and FCIVX (2.64) have matching dividends . FCIVX was incepted earlier than TOLSX: FCIVX (9 years) vs TOLSX (17 years). TOLSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). TOLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). TOLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: TOLSX (2500) vs FCIVX (10000). TOLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. FCIVX (-3.21). TOLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.05 vs. FCIVX (8.15).
| FCIVX | TOLSX | FCIVX / TOLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.21 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.194 | 13.083 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150M | 869M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.68 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.21 | 1.70 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.81 | 8.54 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.15 | 15.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement