Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs RGFTX
MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$17.05
Change-$0.07 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.4M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.58
Change-$0.08 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.54M
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. RGFTX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 353M vs. FCIVX (151M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FCIVX: RGFTX (3.01) vs FCIVX (2.71). FCIVX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FCIVX (9 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.78). RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: RGFTX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.27 vs. FCIVX (-0.37). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 20.81 vs. FCIVX (7.74).
| FCIVX | RGFTX | FCIVX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.24 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.482 | 20.524 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 353M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 3.01 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.37 | 15.27 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.08 | 35.31 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.74 | 20.81 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement