Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIVX vs RGFTX
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts FCIVX vs RGFTX
MFG Core Infrastructure Service
Price$13.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.72M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets416.23M
FCIVX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIVX vs. RGFTX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIVX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGFTX has more cash in the bank: 416M vs. FCIVX (149M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than FCIVX: RGFTX (2.91) vs FCIVX (2.64). FCIVX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: FCIVX (9 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FCIVX (0.92). RGFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FCIVX (13.00). RGFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIVX: RGFTX (0) vs FCIVX (10000). RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. FCIVX (-5.61). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 18.83 vs. FCIVX (-15.03).
| FCIVX | RGFTX | FCIVX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.24 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.369 | 12.270 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149M | 416M | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.91 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.61 | 11.53 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.05 | 27.54 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.03 | 18.83 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers