Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCISX vs RLBGX
FCISX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts FCISX vs RLBGX
Franklin Income C
Price$2.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.46B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.11
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FCISX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCISX vs. RLBGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCISX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FCISX (76.5B). FCISX pays higher dividends than RLBGX: FCISX (4.74) vs RLBGX (2.01). FCISX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: FCISX (31 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). FCISX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBGX (44.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: RLBGX (250) vs FCISX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. FCISX (8.00). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.37 vs. FCISX (40.08).
| FCISX | RLBGX | FCISX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.25 | 444% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.25 | 448% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.794 | 16.570 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5B | 269B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.74 | 2.01 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 10.35 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.26 | 44.95 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.08 | 43.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.50 | 81.84 | 90% |