Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIRX vs RERGX
FCIRX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FCIRX vs RERGX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl A
Price$17.37
Change-$0.33 (-1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets870.77M
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$59.10
Change-$0.80 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.56B
FCIRX vs RERGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIRX vs. RERGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIRX is a Buy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FCIRX (871M). RERGX pays higher dividends than FCIRX: RERGX (1.37) vs FCIRX (0.39). FCIRX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FCIRX (8 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FCIRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIRX (12.00). RERGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIRX: RERGX (250) vs FCIRX (15000). RERGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.95 vs. FCIRX (1.56). FCIRX return over 5 years is better than : 55.47 vs. RERGX (20.61).
| FCIRX | RERGX | FCIRX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.47 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.47 | 253% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.288 | 10.015 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 871M | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.37 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.56 | 3.95 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.62 | 26.91 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.47 | 20.61 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement