Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERCX
FCIHX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERCX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.88
Change+$0.18 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets757.37M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$63.63
Change+$0.50 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
FCIHX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a StrongBuy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FCIHX (757M). FCIHX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FCIHX (0.64) vs RERCX (0.46). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERCX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. FCIHX (5.36).
| FCIHX | RERCX | FCIHX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.12 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.309 | 20.782 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.46 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.36 | 11.90 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 28.48 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 0.98 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.09 | 39.64 | 207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement