Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERCX
FCIHX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERCX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets758.82M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$61.84
Change+$0.19 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.4B
FCIHX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a StrongBuy and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FCIHX (759M). FCIHX pays higher dividends than RERCX: FCIHX (0.66) vs RERCX (0.49). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERCX (23 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). RERCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERCX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. FCIHX (-3.80).
| FCIHX | RERCX | FCIHX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.12 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.289 | 18.558 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 759M | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.49 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.80 | 5.19 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 49.58 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.81 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.71 | 47.52 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement