Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs RERBX
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs RERBX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$18.00
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets765.4M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$62.96
Change+$0.48 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.09B
FCIHX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. RERBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a StrongBuy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FCIHX (765M). FCIHX pays higher dividends than RERBX: FCIHX (0.64) vs RERBX (0.23). FCIHX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FCIHX (2 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIHX (10.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: RERBX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.02 vs. FCIHX (9.55).
| FCIHX | RERBX | FCIHX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.56 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.56 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.974 | 23.815 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 765M | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.23 | 277% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 16.02 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 33.99 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 6.29 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.79 | 41.87 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement