FCHRF
Price
$78.60
Change
+$1.55 (+2.01%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.63B
RBC
Price
$394.75
Change
-$7.17 (-1.78%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
12.46B
74 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCHRF vs RBC

Header iconFCHRF vs RBC Comparison
Open Charts FCHRF vs RBCBanner chart's image
GEORG FISCHER AG
Price$78.60
Change+$1.55 (+2.01%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.63B
RBC Bearings
Price$394.75
Change-$7.17 (-1.78%)
Volume$141.3K
Capitalization12.46B
FCHRF vs RBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCHRF vs. RBC commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHRF is a Buy and RBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FCHRF: $78.60 vs. RBC: $394.75)
Brand notoriety: FCHRF and RBC are both not notable
FCHRF represents the Industrial Machinery, while RBC is part of the Tools & Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCHRF: 373% vs. RBC: 84%
Market capitalization -- FCHRF: $6.63B vs. RBC: $12.46B
FCHRF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $6.63B. RBC’s [@Tools & Hardware] market capitalization is $12.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $213.96B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tools & Hardware] industry ranges from $24.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.88B. The average market capitalization across the [@Tools & Hardware] industry is $6.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCHRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCHRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBC is a better buy in the long-term than FCHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCHRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCHRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RBC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCHRF is a better buy in the short-term than RBC.

Price Growth

FCHRF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RBC (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.00% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Tools & Hardware (+1.36% weekly)

Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBC($12.5B) has a higher market cap than FCHRF($6.63B). RBC has higher P/E ratio than FCHRF: RBC (49.53) vs FCHRF (21.37). RBC YTD gains are higher at: 31.962 vs. FCHRF (3.448). FCHRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 583M vs. RBC (494M). FCHRF has more cash in the bank: 488M vs. RBC (133M). RBC has less debt than FCHRF: RBC (981M) vs FCHRF (1.67B). FCHRF has higher revenues than RBC: FCHRF (3.74B) vs RBC (1.67B).
FCHRFRBCFCHRF / RBC
Capitalization6.63B12.5B53%
EBITDA583M494M118%
Gain YTD3.44831.96211%
P/E Ratio21.3749.5343%
Revenue3.74B1.67B224%
Total Cash488M133M367%
Total Debt1.67B981M171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBC: Fundamental Ratings
RBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCHRFRBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCO17.910.34
+1.94%
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil
CORX10.24N/A
N/A
2x Corn ETF
VCRB77.42-0.10
-0.13%
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
IBII25.98-0.06
-0.24%
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term Tips ETF
KBWP119.66-1.36
-1.12%
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Ins ETF

FCHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCHRF has been loosely correlated with B. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCHRF jumps, then B could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCHRF
1D Price
Change %
FCHRF100%
N/A
B - FCHRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
SDVKF - FCHRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUTIF - FCHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTLS - FCHRF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
RBC - FCHRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
More

RBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBC has been loosely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBC jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBC
1D Price
Change %
RBC100%
-1.78%
ITT - RBC
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
FELE - RBC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
PH - RBC
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
NPO - RBC
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
DOV - RBC
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
More