FCHRF
Price
$78.60
Change
+$1.55 (+2.01%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.53B
GTLS
Price
$199.45
Change
+$0.09 (+0.05%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
8.96B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCHRF vs GTLS

Header iconFCHRF vs GTLS Comparison
Open Charts FCHRF vs GTLSBanner chart's image
GEORG FISCHER AG
Price$78.60
Change+$1.55 (+2.01%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.53B
Chart Industries
Price$199.45
Change+$0.09 (+0.05%)
Volume$2.16M
Capitalization8.96B
FCHRF vs GTLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FCHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCHRF vs. GTLS commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHRF is a Hold and GTLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FCHRF: $78.60 vs. GTLS: $199.45)
Brand notoriety: FCHRF and GTLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCHRF: 176% vs. GTLS: 74%
Market capitalization -- FCHRF: $6.53B vs. GTLS: $8.96B
FCHRF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $6.53B. GTLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $8.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $206.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCHRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FCHRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GTLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTLS is a better buy in the long-term than FCHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCHRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCHRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GTLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTLS is a better buy in the short-term than FCHRF.

Price Growth

FCHRF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GTLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.43% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLS($8.96B) has a higher market cap than FCHRF($6.53B). GTLS has higher P/E ratio than FCHRF: GTLS (36.66) vs FCHRF (21.35). GTLS YTD gains are higher at: 4.512 vs. FCHRF (3.448). GTLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 971M vs. FCHRF (583M). FCHRF has more cash in the bank: 488M vs. GTLS (342M). FCHRF has less debt than GTLS: FCHRF (1.67B) vs GTLS (3.67B). GTLS has higher revenues than FCHRF: GTLS (4.25B) vs FCHRF (3.74B).
FCHRFGTLSFCHRF / GTLS
Capitalization6.53B8.96B73%
EBITDA583M971M60%
Gain YTD3.4484.51276%
P/E Ratio21.3536.6658%
Revenue3.74B4.25B88%
Total Cash488M342M143%
Total Debt1.67B3.67B46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTLS: Fundamental Ratings
GTLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCHRFGTLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STXK33.160.16
+0.49%
Strive Small-Cap ETF
SUSC23.500.11
+0.47%
iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
KPRO29.45N/A
N/A
KraneShares 100% KWEB Dfnd OutcmJan27ETF
GIND26.38-0.11
-0.42%
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF
TSLQ13.59-1.05
-7.17%
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF

FCHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCHRF has been loosely correlated with B. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCHRF jumps, then B could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCHRF
1D Price
Change %
FCHRF100%
N/A
B - FCHRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.33%
SDVKF - FCHRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUTIF - FCHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTLS - FCHRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
RBC - FCHRF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
More

GTLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLS has been closely correlated with FLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTLS jumps, then FLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLS
1D Price
Change %
GTLS100%
+0.05%
FLS - GTLS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
PH - GTLS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
ETN - GTLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
EMR - GTLS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
DOV - GTLS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More