Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs TRCLX
FCHKX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs TRCLX
Fidelity Advisor China Region C
Price$47.08
Change+$0.63 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.46
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.93M
FCHKX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. TRCLX (60.9M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: TRCLX (1.39) vs FCHKX (0.50). FCHKX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: FCHKX (17 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FCHKX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. FCHKX (30.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: FCHKX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). FCHKX (42.88) and TRCLX (41.88) have marching annual gain over last year. FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 0.17 vs. TRCLX (-0.20).
| FCHKX | TRCLX | FCHKX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.03 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.913 | 27.083 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 60.9M | 2,274% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.39 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.88 | 41.88 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.04 | 16.50 | 328% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.17 | -0.20 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement